Abstract
The mainstream narrative of intercultural communication (IC) as a field remains Euro/U.S.-centric despite efforts to (re)imagine it from the margins. To shift this, in this exploratory essay we challenge the disciplinary contours of IC by using a pluriversal framework. We ask, how to pluriversalize Euro/U.S.-centric IC scholarship when it already penetrates non-European/U.S. spaces? And what lessons can this offer? To that end, we turn to a comparative review of the state of IC in the Gulf Cooperation Council states and Taiwan. We propose that to pluriversalize a focus on indigeneity and human-nature relationships is needed; and the concept of relational ontologies bind the two cases together and can be extended to other non-Euro/U.S. spaces so that pluriversal alternatives can appear.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 182–204 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Annals of the International Communication Association |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 17 Mar 2024 |
Keywords
- GCC states
- Pluriverse
- Taiwan
- intercultural communication
- relational ontology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pluriversal possibilities for the Euro/U.S.-centric intercultural communication field? A review of the Gulf Cooperation Council states and Taiwan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver