Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pluriversal possibilities for the Euro/U.S.-centric intercultural communication field? A review of the Gulf Cooperation Council states and Taiwan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The mainstream narrative of intercultural communication (IC) as a field remains Euro/U.S.-centric despite efforts to (re)imagine it from the margins. To shift this, in this exploratory essay we challenge the disciplinary contours of IC by using a pluriversal framework. We ask, how to pluriversalize Euro/U.S.-centric IC scholarship when it already penetrates non-European/U.S. spaces? And what lessons can this offer? To that end, we turn to a comparative review of the state of IC in the Gulf Cooperation Council states and Taiwan. We propose that to pluriversalize a focus on indigeneity and human-nature relationships is needed; and the concept of relational ontologies bind the two cases together and can be extended to other non-Euro/U.S. spaces so that pluriversal alternatives can appear.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)182–204
Number of pages22
JournalAnnals of the International Communication Association
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • GCC states
  • Pluriverse
  • Taiwan
  • intercultural communication
  • relational ontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pluriversal possibilities for the Euro/U.S.-centric intercultural communication field? A review of the Gulf Cooperation Council states and Taiwan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this